Why the Best-Looking Girls Are Out During Daytime
Note: I'm doing a little series on day game articles, in anticipation of the launch of Hector's new day game course, Meet Girls Everywhere.
Note: I'm doing a little series on day game articles, in anticipation of the launch of Hector's new day game course, Meet Girls Everywhere.
I thought I'd draw up a fun article on different 'classes' of women and where they can be found. Somewhat similar to a 'monster compendium' of Dungeons & Dragons fame.
Since we're doing this day game focus (with Hector's day game course Meet Girls Everywhere about ready to launch), I was thinking about the girls you most often meet via day game vs. those you meet via night game vs. those you meet via dating apps.
I thought this'd be a neat little piece to do; one that differentiates between these different types, whom you will most often meet in different ways/venues/times/places.
Our 8 types of women are:
Without further ado, let's explore each...
I can hear you already:
"But Chase, I thought it was screening and qualifying women? Not screening versus qualifying!"
Ordinarily, yes. This article's about a slightly different tack, however.
In much of usual seduction practice, screening is a tool to get women to qualify. Or a tool to see whether women are invested enough to qualify.
For example, you tell a girl, "There's nothing like a good adventure. Going somewhere new, doing something novel, trying some unique food or experience for the first time. I love it, personally." That's an implied screen.
When you screen her like that, assuming you already have rapport with her, there's a fair bit of pressure on her to qualify herself and answer, "Yes, I like adventure too."
Even if she's the opposite of adventurous, she's going to feel pressure to tell you, "Yeah, that sounds nice," just to avoid breaking rapport.
As she qualifies herself to you like this, she complies with your frame.
If she doesn't qualify herself, it's an indication she may not be that compliant with you just yet.
Either way, this is helpful for your seduction.
But there are certain times you aren't going to want a woman trying to qualify herself to your screens.
Sometimes, you are using the screen to actually screen for whatever it is the screen's about.
And if she starts qualifying herself, instead of giving you the straight truth, she'll be investing, but you aren't going to be getting what information you're after.
Ever look at a girl and have her smile at you?
It's one of the oldest approach invitations in the book, and also one of the clearest.
Whether she smiles at you first or you smile at her, then she smiles, if she holds eye contact with you while smiling at you, you've got a ringer.
I've used this approach invitation to identify girls it'll be real easy to meet for years.
I've even had girls I held eye contact with and shared smiles with do the opening themselves. There's something about that mutual locked eyes, shared smiling signal that emboldens even women to make an approach.
I've used this to prompt a fair few girls to approach me themselves in social venues. I would've approached them myself later had they not made a move, but sometimes once she's had that smile and locked eye contact from you she's going to dive right in.
One of the few times I've been street-stopped it was by a really good-looking 20-something girl in a tan business suit on my way to the subway midday on a weekday after we locked eyes and shared smiles. She was so forward it took me aback; I doubt she'd have had the confidence without that prolonged smile and eye lock.
A lot of guys overthink this invitation.
"She's just being friendly," they think.
"Maybe she's just having a good day."
"She could be smiling at someone else."
Yet the vast majority of the time a woman is holding eye contact with you and smiling at you somewhere, it is not because she's just having that splendid of a day, but instead that she likes you and would like to meet.
On my article about your opinions of women betraying your success (or lack thereof) with women, a reader writes
Hey Chase,
Jealousy plotlines are great tools for upping and maintaining attraction in situations where you can't immediately pull (or the girl needs more priming before the pull).
They set up competition for you between women. They get women laser-focused on you as the prize they're trying to win. And they preselect you to the hilt.
They are fantastic tools, used right, to pick girls up with.
There's just one problem:
If you're uncareful, women you run jealousy plotlines on can auto-reject.
The girl you want may decide you are simply too big a flirt... that you are only toying with her, with no real intention to escalate things anywhere with you... that this is just a thing you do with girls, where you suck them in for your own validation, then cast them aside.
More mature women will often just leave whatever venue they're in where they think you're 'taunting' them, and simply not reply to your messages after that.
Less mature women may try to 'get back at' you, by running their own jealousy plotlines... flirting with some other guy, touching some other guy, making out with some other guy, going home with some other guy.
But there's a way you can maintain a loud, clear signal to women you're running jealousy plotlines with that they are your prime choice.
You can keep yourself attainable, even as you leave women in suspense, wondering if they really will get you or not.
The thing you'll do is simple, but it sends a loud, clear message to the woman you want -- and causes the other girls you flirt with to switch into overdrive trying to win you over.
In influence, there is this phenomenon known as social proof.
How much of seduction is words, appearance, or actions... and how much of it is just frames?
If I walk up to a woman and she acts like she doesn't want me and I accept that frame, that was frames.
Likewise, if I walk up to a woman and she acts like she doesn't want me, then I persist with her in a charming way that conveys I know she really does want me, and she decides she finds me intriguing and starts to feel attraction, that was frames too.
If someone accuses me of something, and I accept the accusation and feel ashamed and bashfully apologize, that's frames.
Just the same, if someone accuses me of something, and I parry that accusation and making a convincing case that in fact I was in the right all along, and the other party backs down, well that too is frames.
Frames run as a constant undercurrent throughout all social interaction. If you've followed along with Alek Rolstad's latest series on frames, you know you can divide frames up into social and sexual, for instance. You know, from his series and our other pieces here on frame control, of various ways you can adjust, tweak, and impose your frames.
Good frame control consists of the expert interplay between known facts and offered explanations. If I saw someone grab my basketball and walk off the basketball court with it, and I believe he stole it and am about to alert the police officer standing nearby, you won't change my mind by insisting that I'm wrong and I didn't see it and that guy did not steal the basketball. However, you might change my mind by telling me he's a good guy and he only just took the basketball to reinflate it because it was low on air and getting flat, and that he'll be right back with it.
If you're telling the truth, you'll have saved a good Samaritan from a run-in with the police; if you're lying, you'll have allowed a thief to escape with my basketball. Either way, by pulling me into your frame, you have altered the course of events.
Frames won't always be as cut-and-dry as 'stealing or not stealing' either.
Many times what is being framed is something fuzzy:
In the end, what determines how a great many things in your social life go is how good you are at framing: how expertly you frame, how well you tie the frames you establish to known facts and details, and how believably you convey your own belief in the frames you purport to hold.
How'd you like to meet more girls during the daytime -- more easily?
In this video, in advance of the release of Hector's day game course Meet Girls Everywhere, I interview Girls Chase's own Hector Castillo about all things day game.
Hector reveals some of his day game secrets... how he got started in day game (and how he got good)... how day game compares to other forms of game... and more.
Give our interview a watch here:
(if the video didn't load the first time make sure you RELOAD the page; you'll only need to do once if it didn't load... some JavaScript thing)
On our forum, there's a field report a member of ours shared where a beautiful girl he met in a nightclub tricked him into buying a drink, then strung him along after that.
The drink-buy then triggered the predictable possession/reciprocation instinct any guy who's been manipulated into buying things for women has experienced. That in turn led our forum member, who's usually a pretty solid guy, to make a bunch more mistakes and dig a much deeper hole than he normally would.
He was honest about how things went:
... and all those emotions caused him to continue to pursue this girl, digging himself into a deeper and deeper hole.
I went through many such situations early on in my seduction career.
Most guys will -- especially guys who do night game, and especially guys who do clubs.
When it happens, you will typically know you are doing something wrong -- as Beam did here -- but you will do it anyway, driven by emotions of wanting to get back your pride, balance things out with this woman who tooled you, and save face.
But this is almost never the right course of action: it won't get you the girl, and it won't improve your outing.
Instead, you must deal with embarrassing/humiliating situations with women in-field in a different way.