Impulse Texting Is Out (Buy It Now!)

Impulse Texting at long last is out.
Impulse Texting at long last is out.
Hey guys, welcome back.
Table of Contents
Today I want to talk about my early inspirations and the people who inspired me that formed the foundation of my game. Next week I will discuss my later inspirations.
I’ve developed my own style, honed from creating many techniques, including sex talk. I‘ve developed strategies and concepts like FSC (female state control) and more.
But I have been influenced by other great seducers. Some have inspired me to create my own stuff, others have provided the basis for my material, and some have offered techniques and theories that help my game even today.
I will list my main inspirations from my earlier days, adding what they have contributed to my game. I will critically discuss each contribution by pointing out the flaws in each method (my personal opinions) and how I counteracted these to help my game.
So let’s begin with my first love.
In just two days, my state-of-the-art texting system Impulse Texting hits shelves.
I hope you’re ready to start getting girls texting you back on impulse – because that’s what this system enables you to do (and if you have not seen them yet, check out the free videos on what this system does for you).
For now though, let’s talk about “friendly texter” girls.
These are the girls who will text you back, never ghost you, and are always friendly… yet never want to go out onto dates with you.
What causes this? Are they shy? Are they busy? Are you not asking them out the right way? Are they just too nice to not text you back?
There are a few things to understand about these girls, and girls texting in general, to get a handle on what’s going on with these situations.
From there, we’ll talk about what to do with girls like this in your phone.
What makes texting girls so much more fraught than in-person communication?
Guys will sometimes freeze up and be unsure what to say next in-person, sure.
But it happens a LOT more over text! How often have you sat looking at a text message asking yourself, “What do I say to this?” only to send something that doesn’t even get a reply?
How do some men take a woman who’s barely interested in them and make her fall in love?
How do so many other men manage to turn women who were attracted to them into women who no longer are?
In one week, I open the doors for IMPULSE TEXTING… my innovative new text-the-girl course that teaches you to use the psychology of natural conversations to get girls texting you back on impulse.
Today I have a second free video on creating natural conversations with women over text.
In it, we talk about why most guys’ text message convos DON’T feel natural… plus I give you a couple of tips you can start using today to help remedy this.
Hey guys and welcome back.
Table of Contents
In my last article, I gave an overview of after-hours venues.
These venues remain open after the general nightlife closes. They are the clubs that people go to if they want to party more. They usually attract more of the power-going crowd, like ravers and clubbers. Those may make up half the crowd. The rest will be regular people who have no idea how they got there.
I recommended opting for gay-friendly after-hours places or straight-friendly gay places. They tend to have the most girls with less male competition (most men there are gay).
Gay-friendly after-hours places are not unusual because those places are known as party scenes, and nobody parties harder, longer, and more seriously than gay people. They will readily go to the after-hours venues. Most after-hours venues that are good have a gay clientele.
Those that don’t tend to be sausage fests with primarily straight men.
You may see more men, but most don’t “count” because they are gay. This is even more so in gay venues open to straight people. Even more interesting is that gay and gay-friendly venues often have more girls than those that do not attract the gay crowd.
And no, they are not lesbians.
We have a romantically inexperienced member on the forum right now struggling to understand why women want men capable of provision in long-term relationships. Why can’t he just be his “really really cute” and “adorable” (his words) self and let women provide for him?
It might seem to make sense, after all. Women get more college degrees than men these days and, at least before age 30, in many cities (like New York and Washington, D.C.) out-earn men. The sex roles have flipped. It’s time for women to take on the provider role. Isn’t it?
This member in the thread above later argued that because women have slept with different men and are not virgins, they don’t bring enough to the table and do not deserve his resources. Therefore, they should be willing to do the work and bring home the bacon while he kicks around at home, presumably tidying up the house and working in the shed, or maybe the flower garden (after a hard day of “looking really, really cute,” I guess).
It’s obviously an absurd position to hold, but… why?
WHY is it ridiculous that a man could be the really, really cute & adorable, dependent, lovely house husband and a woman the hard-working, doting breadwinner – even in our modern, feministic, egalitarian society?
In just a week and a half, on Saturday, July 15th, I’ll be opening the doors to my never-before-released texting system, Impulse Texting.
As we gear up for that, I’ve put together a series of videos for you on a set of pressing texting issues and questions men run into with women.
In today’s video, we examine one key question: why aren’t girls texting you back?
Go here to watch the video:
I see a lot of stuff online claiming that, “If a girl doesn’t text you first, it means she’s not that interested.”
In articles and videos with this conclusion, the advice to men tends to be something like if she never texts you first, you should move on, and find a girl who’s more interested.
Find a girl who will actually text you first, instead.
Is this actually good advice?
Or is this advice all washed up?