Coronavirus is sweeping the Western world now, after having already swept across East Asia.
Contents
Tests are something you'll never get free of with women. Because tests are an essential part of how women evaluate a man.
New man they've just met... old man they've long known... women will test both men alike, any time they feel they have any reason to at all.
You can't take testing personally, because it is not a 'personal' thing from women.
Rather, it is simply how women poke for holes in your armor. Fewer armor holes = more attractive.
Today we'll discuss a simple and effective way to deal with tests: just mirror them back.
Somehow, despite the existence of this website, and the half million to million people who read it every month, there are apparently more men desperate for female approval than ever in recorded history.
There is an outright simp epidemic.
Is there anything sadder than a man who swallows his pride, pedestalizes the feminine, and launches limp-wristed attacks against his fellow man in a feeble attempt to curry favor with women?
Truly, there is no man more tragic than the simp.
First, here is the SIMP TEST. Watch this video, and pay careful attention to your emotions:
SIMPING IS KING SHIT CONFIRMED pic.twitter.com/B7kF1f6wfN
— Ching (@Hotline_Ching) March 10, 2020
Did you experience a sort of cognitive dissonance, and a kind of revulsion that says, "Though this woman is young and attractive, I find her oddly and off-puttingly moronic, and I also think she is lying?"
Congratulations, you are not a simp. The rest of this article does not apply to you.
However, you may want to read it anyway to make especially sure to inoculate yourself against the dangers of simp-dom.
On the other hand, if, when watching that video, did you not experience any cognitive dissonance, and instead experienced a swelling of pride? Did you feel something along the lines of, "This beautiful woman recognizes me for my superior quality?"
If so, I regret to inform you you are a carrier of SIMP.
But don't fear.
There is a cure.
If you follow my 10-step method, we can restore your testosterone levels to normal, train you to prefer manly domination over effeminate obeisance, and make you a man women actually respect and desire to sleep with (perhaps even chase), rather than one they manipulate then giggle about as he conducts himself in embarrassing fashion on their behalfs.
The girl you've met at the bar you're at seems like she's just about being ready to be pulled.
"Well," you say to her, "if you've had enough socializing, let's go get that nightcap." You pause a split second. "You have to promise to be a good houseguest though," you add.
She smiles, and a light tinkle of laughter ripples out of her. "I promise," she says.
Contents
You offer her the crook of your arm, she wraps her arm through it, and out the doors of the bar you stride, into the night together.
You see what happened there?
You skipped right over asking her to decide if she's coming with you or not... one of the most nerve-wracking moments for most guys. Instead, you asked her something else -- something easier -- to which she said "yes."
And the moment she said yes to that second, easier request, her compliance with the earlier, bigger one became automatic.
How did that work?
Well, you used a secondary compliance request (that she be a good houseguest), to obtain automatic compliance with the primary request (that she come to your house).
Neat trick, right? Let's look at it a little more in-depth.
Lately we've had a spate of guys in the comments or on the forums worried about this or that potential, hypothetical situation.
Typically these guys are not actually in the field. i.e., they are not actively approaching women and getting live experience with the opposite sex. Or, if they are, their activity levels are minimal.
Thus, these hypothetical situations are really more of a series of thought experiments for them.
And while it is good to try to get yourself some answers in advance, when you go too far into hypotheticals all you are really doing is tying yourself up.
The stuff guys get caught up worrying about when they're not active in the field tends to be stuff that they will almost never run into once they ARE active... or stuff that, if they run into it once they are active, they'll easily handle.
Or will discover is not actually that big of a deal.
Yet, because they aren't active, and are just imagining these things in their head, just like with the One Special Girl Problem™, and the Amazing Connection With A Girl You've Just Met Problem™, it is all too easy to blow things way out of proportion in their imaginations, and start fixating on stuff that is not as significant as they think -- or may not even be there at all.
Do women sometimes hit you with player accusations?
Does it feel like girls you approach are skeptical of you? As if they keep their guards up, not wanting to be so vulnerable with you they get hurt?
This is how people are with those they don't trust. Players are people women don't trust. A woman might be attracted to a player, but she often won't trust him.
And if she doesn't trust you, she probably won't go to bed with you.
There are a few different ways to overcome this 'player problem' and sleep with lots of girls.
One of the more reliable ways is what we might call 'being the anti-player'... really just a series of tactics that let you show a woman you are not going to hurt her or ditch her.
Combine that with your usual attractive, flirtatious, escalating self, and what you have is a guy who very easily leads women step-by-effortless-step through her seduction.
An open loop is a conversation line you open, which you then leave open as you switch to a different topic.
For example, you say "You know, I found this incredible little restaurant when driving around Southside last Sunday. Do you ever drive around Southside? I know it's a little down in the dumps but blah blah..."
You opened the topic of 'incredible little restaurant', then switched to a different topic (driving around Southside).
Meanwhile, you've left the 'incredible little restaurant' topic open. You can now loop back to it later if you wish.
Open loops are handy, because they serve as ready topics for you to switch back to later on. If one topic of conversation dries up, you can flip back to a loop you opened earlier.
Master conversationalists create lots of open loops. Open loops can serve as lifelines, bailing you out when something you tried conversationally does not work.
Seeding is a kind of open loop -- where you open the loop of something you'd like to do with someone at some point, then return to it later on.
Open loops have many uses.
For today's Tactics Tuesdays installment, I'll show you several of those uses (to help you get the gist of the tactic... but there are myriad uses for open loops), and I'll give you more examples of how to open a loop within your conversations.
Ever meet a girl on a bus or a train, and you start talking, and it seems to go great... and then all of a sudden she's telling you "That's my stop, I have to go!"... and the next thing you know, she's gone, and you hadn't even grabbed her contact details?
Ever take a girl on a date, and just when it starts to get good she tells you "Hey, I'm sorry, but I have to leave now, I have an appointment in 30 minutes and I have to get going."
That's always super awkward, isn't it?
What if you didn't have to run into these scenarios ever again?
What if you always made sure you had girls' contact info far in advance of them leaving, and you knew exactly when a date had to end, so you could be sure to end it on your terms?
Well, you can.
It's very simple.
All you need to do is, very quickly into any conversation or date where there's any possibility of a time constraint, make sure you know how much time she has.
I've interacted with lots and lots of students over the years.
You see all types, in terms of depths of study and levels of results:
There are the guys who study seduction for a bit and use it to get some lays and find a girlfriend
Then there are the guys who study seduction in-depth and go on to get respectably good with girls -- they rack up respectable notch counts, get some beautiful girls, and build a mini harem or settle down with a top notch long-term partner or wife
There are the guys who poke around with it a bit, read some, watch some, experiment a little, but never really commit to learning it, and drift off, eventually meeting whatever women come into their lives in more conventional ways (e.g., dating a friend's ex... hooking up with a girl from work... meeting some chick off a dating app, etc.)
Then you get guys who get into seduction for a while, do well with girls, but drift off to something else before they can really cement their results, presumably because woman success doesn't really do a lot for them and something else is more engaging to them
And, finally, in the 'most likely to leave irate and disappointed' category, you get the guys who get into it, became obsessive about it, but focus on the wrong things, and proceed to struggle for a while (sometimes for years), until they eventually flame out, sometimes angrily so
Among the guys who've actually studied seduction, except for those guys who flame out, there are generally positive feelings. It's pretty hard to argue that things like "keep your posture tall and erect" and "lead your conversations where you want them to go" is bad or harmful advice. Even if a guy doesn't stick with it long enough to get many immediate results, he will generally appreciate whatever he did learn.
However, there is a class of student that's mystified me for a long time.
This class of student will show up later on, typically after he's become disillusioned with a branch (or all branches) of seduction for this or that reason, and either accuse you (the teacher), or other teachers in the space, of giving shoddy advice that doesn't work.
Then you will ask him what this advice is that is not working for him, and he will tell you things that no seduction teacher has ever told a student to do, and that violate what you yourself personally tell people to do.
And you will wonder how did this chap get it in his head that this horrible advice he has seemingly pulled out of thin air is in fact what seduction teachers want people to do?
When I figured out what caused this, it also led me to a thinking mistake many students of just about any field (including seduction) appear to be prone to make.
That problem is the problem of thinking in extremes.
A couple months back, a member of our forums named Fluxcapacitor shared this tale:
Dudes! I went out with a couple of mates this week an I noticed this girl that I was interested in, my mate apparently seen her a week or so before. He went on to tell me he talked to her (which was surprising because he doesn't approach) and he got her number. She ignored 2 text messages, then he found her on social media (stalker alert...) an she didn't accept the "friend" or respond to his message. I don't think this is going anywhere fast for him.....
I felt like I couldn't approach this girl while he was about (he doesn't have abundance mentality an I wouldn't be surprised if he's already name their future children already :') ) an that it would look like I was stepping on his toes. I also thought to myself she'd have seen me with him so would possibly turn me down or ghost me to so it wasn't awkward but maybe she isn't that considerate......
I decided not to approach due to him cause I felt it would have looked like a dick move, but I don't think he's getting anywhere with it an so there's no harm in it.
Any thoughts dudes?
My response was this:
